Evrardus | Project NOTA Database

Evrardus Edition

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE TEI PUBLIC "-//TEI P5//DTD Main Document Type//EN" "tei_all.dtd">
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt>
				<title>Evrardus</title>
				<author>Stephanus Galdeti</author>
			</titleStmt>
			<editionStmt>
				<edition>work in progress</edition>
				<respStmt>
					<resp>Edited by</resp>
					<name>Alexandra Baneu</name>
				</respStmt>
			</editionStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<distributor>Project NOTA-ERC</distributor>
				<date when="2024-08-19"/>
			</publicationStmt>
			<seriesStmt>
				<title/>
			</seriesStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<listWit>
					<witness xml:id="P1">Paris, BnF lat. 16408</witness>
					<witness xml:id="P2">Paris, BnF lat. 16409</witness>
				</listWit>
				<listObject>
					<object corresp="#P1">
						<objectIdentifier>
							<objectName>Paris, BnF lat. 16408</objectName>
						</objectIdentifier>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="label">BnF. Département des Manuscrits. Latin 16408</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="attribution">Bibliothèque nationale de France</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="license">https://gallica.bnf.fr/html/und/conditions-dutilisation-des-contenus-de-gallica</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="logo">https://gallica.bnf.fr/mbImage/logos/logo-bnf.png</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="related">https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b52514617v</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="description">Questions de théologie et notes diverses dans lesquelles figurent Amand de Valenciennes et beaucoup de professeurs de Paris.</ab>
					</object>
					<object corresp="#P2">
						<objectIdentifier>
							<objectName>Paris, BnF lat. 16409</objectName>
						</objectIdentifier>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="label">BnF. Département des Manuscrits. Latin 16409</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="attribution">Bibliothèque nationale de France</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="license">https://gallica.bnf.fr/html/und/conditions-dutilisation-des-contenus-de-gallica</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="logo">https://gallica.bnf.fr/mbImage/logos/logo-bnf.png</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="related">https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b52514430s</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="description">Thèses théologiques, paraissant avoir été recueillies à Paris par Thomas de Cracovie.</ab>
					</object>
				</listObject>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<encodingDesc>
			<variantEncoding method="parallel-segmentation" location="internal"/>
		</encodingDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text xml:lang="la">
		<body>
			<div>
				<cb ed="#P1" n="14r" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514617v/f36/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> <cb ed="#P2" n="30r" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514430s/f75/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> Evrardus
				Quod infinitum non possit esse vel fieri, a Carmelita et isto captum est, ideo aliud vade loco huius.<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg. sup." wit="#P1">accepisti de hiis <app><lem>2</lem><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P1">14</witDetail></app> 15 24 et prima conclusio tertia quarta</rdg><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">vide ne sit coincidentia inter † et responsionem de secunda et septima et de octava</rdg></app>
			</div>
			<div>
				Primus articulus: utrum Deus sit essentialiter infinitus.
				Suppositiones sunt hee.
				Prima<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">prima suppositio</rdg></app>, aliqua ratio rerum denominativa dicit perfectionem simpliciter.
				<app><lem>Secunda</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, diminutionibus in quantitate corespondent perfectiones in entitate vel in essentia.
				<app><lem>Tertia</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, una sola ratio perfectionalis non sufficit ad integritatem universi.
				<app><lem>Quarta</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, rationes perfectionales sunt essentialiter ordinate.
				<app><lem>Quinta</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, perfectiones priores sunt separabiles realiter a posterioribus.
				<app><lem>Sexta</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, nulla perfectio stat in <app><lem>indivisibile</lem><rdg wit="#P2">indivisibili</rdg></app><app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">Robertus sextam et septimam 12</rdg></app>.
				<app><lem>Septima</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, cuilibet perfectioni corespondet linea propria et distincta.
				<app><lem>Octava</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, cuiuslibet perfectionis linea est infinita. <app><lem>Corollarium</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>: mundus sensibilis non totaliter explicat mundum intelligibilem.
				<app><lem>Nona</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, quelibet perfectionis linea fundat aliam.
				<app><lem>Decima</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, nec omnis gradus perfectionis priorum potest fundare perfectionem posteriorem, nec etiam omnis gradus priorum potest stare cum privatione posteriorum.
				<app><lem>11</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, omne perfectius<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P1">consequens</witDetail></app> communis perfectionis maiorem lineam participat.
				<app><lem>12</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, diversitas specierum non infert diversitatem perfectionum.
				<app><lem>13</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, linea perfectionis prioris cum privatione posteriorum genus constituit.
				<app><lem>14</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, omne genus huius deorsum terminatur vel per minimum sui gradus vel per maximum sui non gradus. Sursum econtra vel per maximum sui gradus vel per minimum sui <cb ed="#P2" n="30v" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514430s/f76/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> non gradus.
				<app><lem>15</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, proportiones et figure perfectionum multiplicant species rerum.
				<app><lem>16</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, nulla species stat in gradu indivisibili.
				<app><lem>17</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, licet in qualibet specie sint gradus infiniti, tamen quantumcumque modicus excessus potest variare speciem.
				<app><lem>18</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, nulla species ex unica sola perfectione consistit.
				<app><lem>19</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, nulla species est nec potest esse infinita.
				<app><lem>20</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, nullum infinitum est nec potest esse in specie.
				<app><lem>21</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, nullius speciei latitudo est infinita, licet cuiuslibet finite latitudo sit infinita<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">minor horum duas recipit</rdg></app>.
				<app><lem>22</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, omnes species eiusdem generis ad invicem proportionantur.
				<app><lem>23</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, infinite sunt perfectiones rebus communicabiles.
				<app><lem>24</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>, tam linea quam numerus perfectionum essentialium in eundem punctum et unitatem unitive concurrunt.
				Iste sunt 24 suppositiones.
			</div>
			<div>
				Conclusiones subsecuuntur vel subinferuntur<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P1">conclusiones</witDetail></app>.
				Prima<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">prima conclusio</rdg></app>: tota latitudo perfectionum tam secundum lineam quam secundum numerum in aliquod unum concurrit actualiter.
				Corollarium<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">b sancti Bernardi capit corollarium</rdg></app>: unus est fons staturitivus omnium perfectionum.
				Secunda: Deus est ens omnium entium perfectissimum.
				Tertia: Deus est numerus infinitus minor omni numero.
				Quarta: Deus est magnitudo infinita minor omni magnitudine.
				Iste sunt conclusiones primi articuli.
			</div>
			<div>
				Secundus articulus de habitudine temporis ad eternitatem<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P2">prima</witDetail><rdg type="add." wit="#P2">sunt</rdg></app>.
			</div>
			<div>
				Suppositiones
				<app><lem>Secundus articulus</lem><witDetail type="om." wit="#P2"/></app>.
				<app><lem>Prima suppositio</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>: tempus est quoddam figmentum anime.
				Secunda: omnis nostra apprehensio est in tempore.
				Tertia: omnis nostra propositio <app><lem>consignificat</lem><rdg wit="#P2">significat</rdg></app> tempus.
				Quarta: habitudo simultatis et coexistentie est ratio formalis enuntiationis de presenti.
				Quinta: habitudo distantie transeuntis a nunc aprehensionis in prius est ratio formalis <app><lem>enuntians</lem><rdg wit="#P2">enuntiationis</rdg></app> de preterito.
				Sexta: habitudo distantie in posterius est formalis ratio enuntiationis de futuro.
				Septima: apprehensio divina segregata et depurata <app><lem>est</lem><witDetail type="sup. lin." wit="#P1"/></app> ab omni tempore.
				Octava: nulla propositio mentis divine <app><lem>consignificat</lem><rdg wit="#P1">consignificata</rdg></app> tempus.
				Nona: una et eadem propositio mentis divine est significativa veritatis apud nos triplici<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P2">ratione</witDetail></app> propositione representate, scilicet de preterito, presenti et futuro.
				Decima: propositioni mentis divine in sua puritate nulla propositio ipsius pure representativa correspondere potest in mente nostra<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">minor</rdg></app>. Hec de suppositionibus.
			</div>
			<div>
				<cb ed="#P2" n="31r" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514430s/f77/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> <app><lem>Conclusiones</lem><witDetail type="a. c." wit="#P2">suppositiones</witDetail></app>
				Prima: nichil temporis<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P2">a</witDetail></app> nec aliquid eorum que sunt in tempore est presens eternitati.
				Secunda: presentia et distantia non sunt predicata immediata respectu quorumlibet.
				Tertia: nichil temporis nec aliquid eorum que sunt in tempore distat ab eternitate.
				Quarta: licet iste ‘Deus est hodie’, ‘Deus fuit heri’, ‘Deus erit cras’ sint vere ad intellectum loquentium, tamen de proprietate sermonis non magis videntur vere quam iste ‘Deus est leo’, ‘Deus est capra’.
				Quinta: propositiones de preterito vel futuro respectu Dei sunt magis improprie quam propositiones de presenti.
			</div>
			<div>
				<cb ed="#P1" n="14v" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514617v/f37/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> Tertius articulus: an Deus moveatur
				<app><lem>Prima</lem><witDetail type="p. c." wit="#P1"/><witDetail type="a. c." wit="#P1">tertia</witDetail></app> conclusio: motus connotat aliqua importantia imperfectionum.
				Secunda: in diffinitione motus aliquid ponitur sicut materiale, aliquid sicut formale.
				Tertia: formale rei complet essentiam rei.
				Quarta: omnis passiva conservatio rei producte est motus.
				Quinta: omnis vitalis operatio est motus.
				Sexta: omnis motus naturalis acquisitivus est inseparabilis ab imperfectionibus motum consequentibus.
				Septima: motus naturalis conservativus caret huiusmodi imperfectionibus.
				Octava: motus vitalis, <app><lem>acquisitivis</lem><rdg wit="#P2">acquisitivus</rdg></app>, vel <app><lem>inhyativis</lem><rdg wit="#P2">inhyativus</rdg></app>, licet separari possit<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P1">a mutatione</witDetail></app> a mutatione et successione, non tamen a potentia.
				Nona: motus animalis <app><lem>consecutivis</lem><rdg wit="#P2">consecutivus</rdg></app> huius vitalis necessario coniungitur omnis istis tribus.
				Decima: omnis huiusmodi vitalis et etiam animalis eius consecutivus ac etiam naturalis acquisitivus de sui natura est terminabilis.
				11: motus vitalis salvativus, inhesivus seu comprehensivus separabilis est ab omnibus istis tribus<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P1">imperfectionibus</witDetail></app> conditionibus.
				12: motus animalis huius consecutivus, licet possit esse sine mutatione succesive totius, non tamen partium.
				13: huius motus tam vitalis quam animalis de sui natura est <app><lem>interminabilis</lem><rdg wit="#P2">terminabilis</rdg></app>. Hec de suppositionibus. Secuuntur corollaria.
			</div>
			<div>
				
					<app>
						<lem>Corollaria</lem>
						<witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/>
						<witDetail type="om." wit="#P2"/>
					</app>
				
				Primum: non omnis motus est mutatio.
				Secundum: non omnis motus est successio.
				<app><lem>Tertia</lem><rdg wit="#P2">tertium</rdg></app>: non omnis motus est actus entis in potentia.
				<app><lem>Quarta</lem><rdg wit="#P2">quartum</rdg></app>: non omnis motus includit imperfectionem.
				Quinta: aliquis motus includit perfectionem sine imperfectione.
			</div>
			<div>
				Conclusiones subinferuntur
				Prima conclusio: impossibile est Deum moveri aliquo motu acquisitivo vel inhyativo naturali, vitali, seu etiam animali.
				Secunda: necesse est Deum motu vitali salvativo moveri.
				Tertia: motus Dei non dicit in Deo compositum.
				Quarta: Deus a se solo movetur.
				Quinta: motus Dei est infinitus et immutabilis.
			</div>
			<div>
				Corollaria
				Corollarium primum: motus Dei non est <cb ed="#P2" n="31v" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514430s/f78/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> mutatio.
				Secundum: quam impossibile est Deum mutari tam necesse est Deum moveri.
			</div>
			<div>
				Ultima conclusio: motus Dei, licet sit a se solo, tamen est ad omnia. Hec de illo principio.
			</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>