Positio Iacobite de incarnatione | Project NOTA Database

Positio Iacobite de incarnatione Edition

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE TEI PUBLIC "-//TEI P5//DTD Main Document Type//EN" "tei_all.dtd">
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt>
				<title>Positio Iacobite de incarnatione</title>
				<author>Stephanus Galdeti</author>
			</titleStmt>
			<editionStmt>
				<edition>work in progress</edition>
				<respStmt>
					<resp>Edited by</resp>
					<name>Alexandra Baneu</name>
				</respStmt>
			</editionStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<distributor>Project NOTA-ERC</distributor>
				<date when="2024-07-22"/>
			</publicationStmt>
			<seriesStmt>
				<title/>
			</seriesStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<listWit>
					<witness xml:id="P1">Paris, BnF lat. 16408</witness>
					<witness xml:id="P2">Paris, BnF lat. 16409</witness>
				</listWit>
				<listObject>
					<object corresp="#P1">
						<objectIdentifier>
							<objectName>Paris, BnF lat. 16408</objectName>
						</objectIdentifier>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="label">BnF. Département des Manuscrits. Latin 16408</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="attribution">Bibliothèque nationale de France</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="license">https://gallica.bnf.fr/html/und/conditions-dutilisation-des-contenus-de-gallica</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="logo">https://gallica.bnf.fr/mbImage/logos/logo-bnf.png</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="related">https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b52514617v</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="description">Questions de théologie et notes diverses dans lesquelles figurent Amand de Valenciennes et beaucoup de professeurs de Paris.</ab>
					</object>
					<object corresp="#P2">
						<objectIdentifier>
							<objectName>Paris, BnF lat. 16409</objectName>
						</objectIdentifier>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="label">BnF. Département des Manuscrits. Latin 16409</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="attribution">Bibliothèque nationale de France</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="license">https://gallica.bnf.fr/html/und/conditions-dutilisation-des-contenus-de-gallica</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="logo">https://gallica.bnf.fr/mbImage/logos/logo-bnf.png</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="related">https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b52514430s</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="description">Thèses théologiques, paraissant avoir été recueillies à Paris par Thomas de Cracovie.</ab>
					</object>
				</listObject>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<encodingDesc>
			<variantEncoding method="parallel-segmentation" location="internal"/>
		</encodingDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text xml:lang="la">
		<body>
			<div>
				<cb ed="#P1" n="19r" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514617v/f46/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> <cb ed="#P2" n="37r" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514430s/f89/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> <app><lem>Positio Iacobite<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P1">conclusiones plures</witDetail></app> de incarnatione</lem><witDetail type="in marg." wit="#P1"/></app>
				Utrum ineffabile primum esse naturam creatam ypostatice valeat sustentare.
				Prima conclusio:<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">conclusio prima</rdg></app> nullum esse creature est intrinsecum ineffabili primo esse. Patet, quia tunc creatura secundum aliquid sui foret ineffabile primum esse.
				Iuxta hoc <app><lem>pono</lem><witDetail type="p. c." wit="#P1"/></app> duas propositiones.<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">corollaria duo</rdg></app> Prima: nullum <app><lem>esse</lem><witDetail type="p. c." wit="#P1"/></app> creature coeternum est ineffabili primo<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P2">est</witDetail></app> esse. Patet, quia vel forent plura coeterna vel aliquod esse creature esset intrinsecum primo esse.
				Secunda, quod ineffabile primum esse non esse contradictionem <app><lem>includere</lem><rdg wit="#P2">includeret</rdg></app> falsigrafo concludi non poterit evidenter. Patet, nam hoc non includere contradictionem contradictionem aliquam non includit.
				<app><lem>Secunda conclusio:</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app> nullum <cb ed="#P2" n="37v" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514430s/f90/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> creatum suppositum naturam creatam potest ex se ypostatice sustentare. Patet, quia, si sic, homo naturaliter posset esse asinus vel lapis. Secundo, quia hoc requirit potentiam infinitam, ut dicunt doctores.
				Corollarium:<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">corollaria duo</rdg></app> Antichristus non erit dyabolus incarnatus. Patet ex conclusione.
				Secundum: nullus habet dubitare de socio suo utrum sit Antichristus.
				<app><lem>Tertia conclusio:</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app> hec est impossibilis ‘homo ypostatice est assumptus’. <app><lem>Patet</lem><witDetail type="om." wit="#P2"/></app>, quia tunc hec esset possibilis ‘nunc sunt duo<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P2">possibiles</witDetail></app> homines et ante non erant nisi unus, et tamen nullus est noviter generatus’. Patet, quia hic homo demonstrato Christo et hic homo assumptus forent duo homines. Item, foret transitus de contraditorio in contradictorium, contra articulum.
				Corollarium<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">corollaria</rdg></app> primum: non quelibet unio ad corpus organizatum denominat hominem constitutum. Patet in Christo in quo constitutum ex anima et corpore non est homo.
				Secundum:<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">dubium</rdg></app> nullum hominem preexistentem potest verbum ineffabile ypostatice sustentare. Patet ex conclusione.
				<app><lem>Quarta conclusio:</lem><witDetail type="iter. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app> ineffabile primum esse naturam creatam potest ypostatice sustentare. Patet, quia sic de facto est.
				Corollarium: hec est possibilis ‘iste homo est ubique, et tamen nulla pars eius est extra istum locum’. Patet de homine Christo.
				Secundum: aliquis homo est hic et Rome et partes istius hominis sunt hic <app><lem>et partes eius sunt Rome</lem><witDetail type="iter." wit="#P1"/></app>, et tamen nulla pars existens hic est Rome. Patet suppositio quod verbum assumeret unam naturam hic et <app><lem>aliam</lem><witDetail type="om." wit="#P2"/></app> Rome.
				Hec de ista positione.
			</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>