Responsio Augustinensis de perfectione specierum

Responsio Augustinensis de perfectione specierum Edition

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE TEI PUBLIC "-//TEI P5//DTD Main Document Type//EN" "tei_all.dtd">
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt>
				<title>Responsio Augustinensis de perfectione specierum</title>
				<author>Stephanus Galdeti</author>
			</titleStmt>
			<editionStmt>
				<edition>work in progress</edition>
				<respStmt>
					<resp>Edited by</resp>
					<name>Alexandra Baneu</name>
				</respStmt>
			</editionStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<distributor>Project NOTA-ERC</distributor>
				<date when="2024-08-12"/>
			</publicationStmt>
			<seriesStmt>
				<title/>
			</seriesStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<listWit>
					<witness xml:id="P1">Paris, BnF lat. 16408</witness>
					<witness xml:id="P2">Paris, BnF lat. 16409</witness>
				</listWit>
				<listObject>
					<object corresp="#P1">
						<objectIdentifier>
							<objectName>Paris, BnF lat. 16408</objectName>
						</objectIdentifier>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="label">BnF. Département des Manuscrits. Latin 16408</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="attribution">Bibliothèque nationale de France</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="license">https://gallica.bnf.fr/html/und/conditions-dutilisation-des-contenus-de-gallica</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="logo">https://gallica.bnf.fr/mbImage/logos/logo-bnf.png</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="related">https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b52514617v</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="description">Questions de théologie et notes diverses dans lesquelles figurent Amand de Valenciennes et beaucoup de professeurs de Paris.</ab>
					</object>
					<object corresp="#P2">
						<objectIdentifier>
							<objectName>Paris, BnF lat. 16409</objectName>
						</objectIdentifier>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="label">BnF. Département des Manuscrits. Latin 16409</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="attribution">Bibliothèque nationale de France</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="license">https://gallica.bnf.fr/html/und/conditions-dutilisation-des-contenus-de-gallica</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="logo">https://gallica.bnf.fr/mbImage/logos/logo-bnf.png</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="related">https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b52514430s</ab>
						<ab type="meta" subtype="description">Thèses théologiques, paraissant avoir été recueillies à Paris par Thomas de Cracovie.</ab>
					</object>
				</listObject>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<encodingDesc>
			<variantEncoding method="parallel-segmentation" location="internal"/>
		</encodingDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text xml:lang="la">
		<body>
			<div>
				<cb ed="#P1" n="20r" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514617v/f48/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> <cb ed="#P2" n="38v" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514430s/f92/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> <app><lem>Responsio Augustinensis de perfectione specierum</lem><witDetail type="in marg. sup." wit="#P1"/></app>
				Utrum a primo<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P2">esse</witDetail></app> necesse duo entia specie differentia equaliter ad ipsum se habentia possint in esse poni.
				Hec questio inter cetera supponit primi ad inferiora habitudinem et econverso. Et querit utrum duo entia specie differentia etc. possint poni sub equali habitudine. Et ideo quia huius habitudo videtur dicere distantiam quandam et excessum perfectionalem et ordinem, ideo pro presenti tria sunt videnda.
				Primum<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">primum videndum</rdg></app> erit de distantia et excessu primi ad inferiora.
				Secundum<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. in marg. sed del." wit="#P1">tertium</witDetail></app> erit de<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P2"><app><lem>x</lem><witDetail type="dub." wit="#P2"/></app></witDetail></app> excessu perfectionali et distantia inferiorum inter se.
				<app><lem>Tertium</lem><witDetail type="add. in marg. sed del." wit="#P1"/></app> erit de ordine inferiorum ad primum.
				Quoad primum<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">prima conclusio de primo</rdg></app> sit ista conclusio: quantum primum est in esse tantum perfectionaliter excedit quodlibet creatum esse. Probatur: primum excedit se toto quidquid excedit, igitur. Consequentia clara<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P2">et</witDetail></app>. Antecedens patet, cum sit supersimplex et indivisibilis.
				Corollarium primum,<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">corollaria tria</rdg></app> quod immense excedit quodlibet creatum esse.
				Secundum, quod inter primum necesse esse et supremum de facto creatum esse sunt sine fine factibilia alia <app><lem>creatura</lem><rdg wit="#P2">creata</rdg></app> esse.
				Tertium: a primo necesse esse non est factibile supremum creabile esse. Hec patent ex conclusione.
				Quoad secundum<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">secundum videndum</rdg></app> quod est de excessu perfectionali et distantia inferiorum inter se sit hec conclusio:<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">conclusio secunda</rdg></app> licet de facto alique species sint <cb ed="#P2" n="39r" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514430s/f93/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> immediate, tamen inter quaslibet species iam <app><lem>productas</lem><rdg wit="#P2">producte</rdg></app> possunt infinite produci. Quoad primam partem patet, quoniam inter speciem hominis et angeli <app><lem>nulla</lem><witDetail type="p. c." wit="#P2"/></app> est media. Secunda pars patet, quoniam excessus unius speciei super aliam est divisibilis, igitur secundum quantitatem continuam ymaginabilis, igitur secundum puncta huius quantitatis producibiles sunt <app><lem>species</lem><witDetail type="om." wit="#P2"/></app> perfectiores et minus perfecte, et ita, cum huius puncta sint infinita, sequitur propositum. Ista conclusio est domini Egidii 3, questione 5, et intelligitur de speciebus absolutis specialissimis.
				Ex hac sequitur<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">corollaria</rdg></app> quod perfectio specifica non est ad modum numeri omnimode estimanda.
				Secundo sequitur quod species superior quodammodo infinite excedit<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P2">superio</witDetail></app> inferiorem, quia per totam multitudinem producibilium inter ipsas.
				Tertio sequitur quod non plures sunt producibiles inter primum et non gradum quam inter secundas species.
				Quoad tertium<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">tertium videndum</rdg></app> sit conclusio<app><lem/><rdg type="add. in marg." wit="#P1">tertia conclusio</rdg></app> ista: tanta est habitudo creatoris vel creabilium ad primum quanta est ipsorum actualis vel possibilis perfectio intrinseca. Ista probatur, nam tanta est huius habitudo quantum participant vel participare possunt <app><lem>perfectionem</lem><witDetail type="om." wit="#P2"/></app> primi, sed quantum participant tanta est eorum perfectio intrinseca actualis et quantum participare possunt tanta est eorum perfectio possibillis, igitur etc.
				<app><lem>Ex hac sequitur</lem><witDetail type="add. in marg." wit="#P1"/></app> quod si primum tantum esset communicabile ad extra per gratiam quantum ad intra per participationem, habitudo una non esset intenssior nec remissior quam alia, et ita utraque esset immensa.
				Secundo sequitur quod impossibile est duas species<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P1">esse eque perfectas intrinsece</witDetail></app> equaliter se habere ad primum, quia impossibile est duas species esse eque perfectas intrinsece.
				Ex hoc ulterius et finaliter sequitur<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P2">part</witDetail></app> pars negativa questionis. Pro hac parte est Magister<app><lem/><witDetail type="add. sed del." wit="#P2">ia</witDetail></app> <name>Iacobus de Viterbio</name> 1, questione 2, articulo 3.
				Hec de ista positione. Et similibus sufficiant pro forma.
			</div>
		</body>
	</text>
</TEI>

Project NOTA Database

Responsio Augustinensis de perfectione specierum Edition

Project NOTA