Project NOTA Database
Project NOTA Database
Browse
Manuscripts
Persons
Visualize
Networks
Maps
Timelines
Texts
About
De questione an mundus fuerat creatus totus simul
Edition
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE TEI PUBLIC "-//TEI P5//DTD Main Document Type//EN" "tei_all.dtd"> <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"> <teiHeader> <fileDesc> <titleStmt> <title>De questione an mundus fuerat creatus totus simul</title> <author>Stephanus Galdeti</author> </titleStmt> <editionStmt> <edition>work in progress</edition> <respStmt> <resp>Edited by</resp> <name>Alexander Baumgarten</name> </respStmt> </editionStmt> <publicationStmt> <distributor>Project NOTA-ERC</distributor> <date when="2025-03-06"/> </publicationStmt> <seriesStmt> <title/> </seriesStmt> <sourceDesc> <listWit> <witness xml:id="P1">Paris, BnF lat. 16408</witness> </listWit> <listObject> <object corresp="#P1"> <objectIdentifier> <objectName>Paris, BnF lat. 16408</objectName> </objectIdentifier> <ab type="meta" subtype="label">BnF. Département des Manuscrits. Latin 16408</ab> <ab type="meta" subtype="attribution">Bibliothèque nationale de France</ab> <ab type="meta" subtype="license">https://gallica.bnf.fr/html/und/conditions-dutilisation-des-contenus-de-gallica</ab> <ab type="meta" subtype="logo">https://gallica.bnf.fr/mbImage/logos/logo-bnf.png</ab> <ab type="meta" subtype="related">https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b52514617v</ab> <ab type="meta" subtype="description">Questions de théologie et notes diverses dans lesquelles figurent Amand de Valenciennes et beaucoup de professeurs de Paris.</ab> </object> </listObject> </sourceDesc> </fileDesc> <encodingDesc> <variantEncoding method="parallel-segmentation" location="internal"/> </encodingDesc> </teiHeader> <text xml:lang="la"> <body> <div> <p><cb ed="#P1" n="132r" facs="https://gallica.bnf.fr/iiif/ark:/12148/btv1b52514617v/f284/full/full/0/native.jpg"/> De questione an mundus fuerat creatus totus simul. Quia ibi posuit respondens aliquid ens non posse totum simul creari.</p> <p>Ostendebam oppositum, scilicet quod nullum tale successum habeat esse, quia nihil de tali est quia non pars quia corrupta vel futura.</p> <p>Et si tu <app><lem>dicas</lem><witDetail type="coni." wit="#P1">dicat</witDetail></app> quod nullus, pari ratione dicam de tempore Adam, quia non plus habet esse res diu corrupta quam cito et similiter degeneranda. Item, quia motus est quamdiu suum tempus et econtra et motus quamdiu mobilis et econtra, et ideo, si Socrates existens in tempore preterito est corruptus, similiter videtur de tempore non ratione instantis, quia quandocumque tempus esset instans esset. Sed hoc falsum, quia instantia immediata, quod videtur falsum, ergo alie rationes huius dubitationis sunt posite alibi, et ideo hoc non plus pono.</p> </div> </body> </text> </TEI>
De questione an mundus fuerat creatus totus simul
...